Talk:Things Man Was Not Meant to Eat

From TheKolWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

could it be possible that TMWNMtE makes the game think you're wearing an extra cloathing item?

initial spading suggests that it increases meat and item (just like stacking cloathing equips does), so if somebody also checked ML, we could confirm this.--The ErosionSeeker (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

  • I don't think Clothing has a ML buff. It definitely does increase meat, I fought a Raver Giant with clothing of loathing on, got 347 meat. Popped the fudge, and he dropped 450.--Toffile (talk) 14:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
  • It does not add a cloathing counter, as it does not affect allstats.--Cannonfire40 (talk) 17:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
    • I think it likely adds a counter to the +meat drop affect, doesn't to the stat buff, and unknown on item drops. Wearing the outfit and having the effect active places it somewhere in the neighborhood of having +256% meat drops. Dropping a piece of equipment and having the effect seemed to give ~+128% meat drops. The sample size is really small, but it's scaling to what's expected if the counter was incremented.--Toffile (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
      • The meat drop and item drop bonuses are variable. In the briny deeps, with nothing equipped, no passives, and no effects but this one, I got this: , all monsters in the deeps have base meat drops of over 100, which means the rounding error with the message shouldn't take place either.--Cannonfire40 (talk) 18:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

The thief at Typographical Clutter is a good test of +meat drops. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 22:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Thank you so, so much. It's +20% meat, unaffected by wearing more pieces of Cloathing. The sea stuff was stupid sea weirdness, bug report confirmed.--Cannonfire40 (talk) 23:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

36 runaways/141 attempts is my data for the initiative (against a monster with +100% init). I had a range of 336-390 on WotP with fudge (376 myst, no other modifiers), and 165-190 without the fudge. (This is suffering from small sample size, though!)--Cannonfire40 (talk) 00:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)