Talk:Your Workshed
From TheKolWiki
Warbear induction oven
I duplicated a milk of magnesium earlier today, so it's definitely not just food. It was the only think I cooked, so I can't speak to the 5% after-the-first chance. --Johnny Treehugger (talk) 03:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- To Yatsufusa
- The following message may come across as a bit aggressive, but I am going to write it either way, for I need outlet for these emotions.
- Your edit (removing "I do not think" edit – hard data is preferred to guess working) actually hurt me rather. If you had bothered to read Talk:Warbear induction oven, you would've seen that I did indeed have more than mere guesswork.
- Also, since the details of this appliance was not entirely known at the time I made the edit, saying "cooking" is better than "cooking food", since the latter claim was both unsupported and challenged.
- Also also, I apologise for using this page for something it was not at all meant for.--Blargh (talk) 17:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- To Blargh: I'm going to say that what you did was not wrong, but where you did it was. The PAGES proper are not the place for "I think" or "I do not think", that is what Talk: is for. On a Talk: page the person doing the thinking, research, etc, is signing their name to their statement. On a regular page authorship is collective. It is okay on a regular page to write "Might" "Seems" "Could" and refer the reader to a talk page. But it is not proper to write in the first person. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 18:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- The text "I do not think" was in the edit description, not the actual page itself. --Vorzer (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- The page did not include "I think" or "I do not think". Seriously, Club? Blargh did nothing wrong.--Cannonfire40 (talk) 20:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies. I misunderstood the edit. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 23:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- To Blargh: I'm going to say that what you did was not wrong, but where you did it was. The PAGES proper are not the place for "I think" or "I do not think", that is what Talk: is for. On a Talk: page the person doing the thinking, research, etc, is signing their name to their statement. On a regular page authorship is collective. It is okay on a regular page to write "Might" "Seems" "Could" and refer the reader to a talk page. But it is not proper to write in the first person. --Club (#66669) (Talk) 18:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
AoSSP
Notes say: "Nash Crosby's Still does not towards your installed appliances." ... does not *what* your installed appliances? ~Erich t/c 12:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)