User talk:Lemonclaw
Contents
Children's Meal of the Damned
- afaik, all these were hacked back in the bad old days before jick got wise to remote form submission and race conditions. it seems unlikely that anyone's going to become any more forthcoming on how they did it after seven years. hell, it seems unlikely that they'll even still be playing. ;) --Evilkolbot 00:28, 9 October 2011 (CEST)
- I've been around since 2004, and the Children's Meals were old, mysterious, unimplemented but occasionally traded items when I started. I briefly owned one. I sold it for less than 200k. :^( --Club (#66669) (Talk) 17:52, 10 October 2011 (CEST)
Kingdom of Buffing chat commands
Ok so I saw this on kingdom of buffing's page. "May 1st Added chat commands for your buffing pleasure. Tried to put them on the wiki, but they didn't like that...have fun figuring them out! :) " So I was wondering why would you wiki people not allow it? Isn't that what the wiki is for, posting useful info? --Lemon-claw 20:26, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Something about KoB already having their own site where they can put that info. --User:Icon315/sig
Meh. That sucks. He hasn't added them to his site. He should. --Lemon-claw 20:57, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
I tried communicating with him about it, but he doesn't answer.
- Do you guys know of a way to see the chart he posted before it was deleted? i can't seem to use the History feature to do it. I was thinking of adding it to my clan's site temporaraly--User:Icon315/sig
No idea. But whoever deleted it. NOT COOL, MAN! --Lemon-claw 21:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Only wiki admins can view histories of deleted pages. (I am not one.) The admins here felt that Kingdom of Buffing was allowed to have an entry on the buffbot page, but didn't warrant a whole separate page. The KoB admin reacted like his baby had been kicked into the mud. Really, his reaction is to post about why it isn't documented here instead of documenting it there? Why is this site so special to him? --Club (#66669) (Talk) 21:41, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- There's some "drama" involved in this one. Basically, Kinks threw a fit when he was told that KoB wouldn't get special treatment. JRSiebz posted an explanation on his talk page, and on the buffbot discussion page. --Itsatrap 21:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Google Wave Invites
I'm requesting an invite from you, if you ever get one yourself. My in game name is same as my wiki name, stufff.--Stufff 05:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Did Seventh spill the beans about how he solved the plinth puzzle? If so, where can I find it on here? I've looked all over and couldn't find it. Thanks. --Lemon-claw 16:58, 15 August 2008 (CDT)
Ok this crap below has happened awhile ago. Maybe I'll delete it since it's old an irrelevant. I doubt anyone will mind. And I'm sure they'll tell me if it's not ok to delete my own talk page.--Lemon-claw 17:38, 4 March 2008 (CST)
- I believe it's not ok. "Never edit others' talk." that includes on your own talk page. --CG1:t,c,e 21:00, 4 March 2008 (CST)
That sucks. Oh well. Then I'll call this page the public talk page since I don't own a talk page. If I did, I could do what I wish with it. --Lemon-claw 21:40, 4 March 2008 (CST)
Scary Pirate
scary pirate (28 Days Later) and scary pirate (cursed) are two completely different pages; the former dropped the zombie pineal gland during the Grey Plague (and no longer exists), while the latter appears when you use a cursed piece of thirteen. --Quietust (t|c) 16:44, 9 December 2007 (CST)
- The scary pirate (28 days later) did not ever happen. Not even during the grey plague. --Lemon-claw 16:47, 9 December 2007 (CST)
- Two things one we try to contain discussions to one page and to how do you figure that scary pirate (28 Days Later) never happened. It did and trying to deny it is just being a jackass. --Chunky_boo 16:52, 9 December 2007 (CST)
- If it didn't happen, then why was the page created over two years ago? --Quietust (t|c) 16:54, 9 December 2007 (CST)
Warning
- Since it seems like you've done nothing on the wiki but be rude and abrasive, here's your one warning: Knock it off, or be banned. Even if you don't like the new content, the wiki is not the place for your complaints. --TechSmurf 09:43, 13 January 2008 (CST)
User Page
- I have been watching this go on since it started, and I hate wars on the recent edit page. Lemonclaw, it is not your right to be an editor of the wiki. The admins have been nice up to this point. You can either follow the rules of the wiki or you can get banned, it's that simple. --Chunky_boo 20:53, 7 February 2008 (CST)
- Ok fine, I'll stop doing that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonclaw (talk • contribs) on 21:04, 7 February 2008
- As I have previously said, you don't remove or edit other's talk, even on your own talk (so don't replace the entire page with what you want to say). It is true that you can do what you want with your own page, but to a certain extent. There are some "Laws" to the wiki that should (and must) be obeyed, the same way that there are laws that prevent you from shooting someone else. We admins are the police: we can stop you from violating these laws (i.e. by removing some stuff from your User page. --CG1:t,c,e 21:17, 7 February 2008 (CST)
- Ok fine, I'll stop doing that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonclaw (talk • contribs) on 21:04, 7 February 2008
I thought "wiping the slate clean" was ok. Well, now I know.
A suggestion for improved wiki usage
As an average wiki contributor, I'd like to suggest that if you find items which require further spading, that perhaps you consider spending some turns and recording some results (item scarcity depending, naturally) and update the wiki yourself. This is in regards to a recent trend where I've seen many posts on talk pages from you which have essentially be contentless "hay guyz spade plz" messages. Bakapyrite 00:28, 10 July 2008 (CDT)
I guess I could do some spading. I was just trying to be the motivator. lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemonclaw (talk • contribs) on 17:11, 10 July 2008
Azimuth tables
These were a relic of the The LAAAAME Observatory. People could put coordinates into the game and look at a spot in the sky for an adventure, sometimes discovering things, and those pages were part of the wiki's efforts to assist in letting people know what places had already been peered at. The final results are elsewhere on the wiki, and the azimuth tables are no longer necessary. Also, stop creating pages in the main space and treating them like talk pages. Especially when you ask for nothing but other people to do the work for you. You should at least create them in the Talk space. In this case you could've asked on my talk page are at thekolwiki:pages for deletion, where the delete request was made and supported some time ago. --Flargen 01:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
oh ok. --Lemon-claw 21:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
