Difference between revisions of "Template talk:NeedsSpading"
From TheKolWiki
(Change how bold is done -- comments?) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This seems like a pretty trivial change, just thought I should give folk a chance to comment in case it'll break something I haven't thought of. --[[User:Starwed|Starwed]] 20:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | This seems like a pretty trivial change, just thought I should give folk a chance to comment in case it'll break something I haven't thought of. --[[User:Starwed|Starwed]] 20:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | *Shouldn't be a problem. Usually, it's wiki syntax that breaks things. Like multi-line comments breaking wiki-bolding. HTML syntax is what we use when wiki syntax is too broken or too inadequate. So using html bold takes, or a div with the "font-weight: bold" style set should do just fine. --[[User:Flargen|Flargen]] 00:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:46, 19 January 2011
I propose that this template, and those like it, use <b> tags instead of wiki syntax -- this is so multiline comments will be in bold.
This seems like a pretty trivial change, just thought I should give folk a chance to comment in case it'll break something I haven't thought of. --Starwed 20:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Shouldn't be a problem. Usually, it's wiki syntax that breaks things. Like multi-line comments breaking wiki-bolding. HTML syntax is what we use when wiki syntax is too broken or too inadequate. So using html bold takes, or a div with the "font-weight: bold" style set should do just fine. --Flargen 00:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
