Difference between revisions of "Template talk:NeedsSpading"
From TheKolWiki
m |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This seems like a pretty trivial change, just thought I should give folk a chance to comment in case it'll break something I haven't thought of. --[[User:Starwed|Starwed]] 20:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | This seems like a pretty trivial change, just thought I should give folk a chance to comment in case it'll break something I haven't thought of. --[[User:Starwed|Starwed]] 20:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
*Shouldn't be a problem. Usually, it's wiki syntax that breaks things. Like multi-line comments breaking wiki-bolding. HTML syntax is what we use when wiki syntax is too broken or too inadequate. So using html bold takes, or a div with the "font-weight: bold" style set should do just fine. --[[User:Flargen|Flargen]] 00:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | *Shouldn't be a problem. Usually, it's wiki syntax that breaks things. Like multi-line comments breaking wiki-bolding. HTML syntax is what we use when wiki syntax is too broken or too inadequate. So using html bold takes, or a div with the "font-weight: bold" style set should do just fine. --[[User:Flargen|Flargen]] 00:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
− | :Ok, did the change on all such templates. Didn't seem to break anything in normal cases, though a place which already used <b> elements broke for some reason. --[[User:Starwed|Starwed]] 21:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC) | + | :Ok, did the change on all such templates. Didn't seem to break anything in normal cases, though a place which already used <nowiki><b></nowiki> elements broke for some reason. --[[User:Starwed|Starwed]] 21:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:49, 20 January 2011
I propose that this template, and those like it, use <b> tags instead of wiki syntax -- this is so multiline comments will be in bold.
This seems like a pretty trivial change, just thought I should give folk a chance to comment in case it'll break something I haven't thought of. --Starwed 20:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
- Shouldn't be a problem. Usually, it's wiki syntax that breaks things. Like multi-line comments breaking wiki-bolding. HTML syntax is what we use when wiki syntax is too broken or too inadequate. So using html bold takes, or a div with the "font-weight: bold" style set should do just fine. --Flargen 00:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, did the change on all such templates. Didn't seem to break anything in normal cases, though a place which already used <b> elements broke for some reason. --Starwed 21:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)